life preserver-- gulf of alaska, near yakutat bay[currently sailing on royal caribbean's "
radiance of the seas" cruise ship]
we boarded our southbound cruise from seward, alaska, last night and are currently approaching the
hubbard glacier. our points of interest and ports of call include juneau, skagway,
icy strait point/hoonah village, ketchikan, and the islands of the inside passage. our final destination is vancouver.
so far, so good. this boat, if you call a vessel this majestic a boat, is quite new and is actually awesome in its presentation. the "radiance of the seas" is mid-size, rather than a gigaship, and apparently 50% of the exterior walls are made up of glass. not only is "the radiance" the nicest looking cruise ship in port, but its sleek profile makes the more upmarket holland america and
celebrity ships appear monstrous, if not like aging industrial workhorses.
i have a negative attitude about cruising, and very limited experience with it, but am changing my mind a little bit. for example, this is a superb way for travelers to access the scenery in southern alaska when limited on time. also, the population enjoying this cruise, dining and entertainment options, and the interior appointments are not as tacky as imagined. alaskan cruises are fairly expensive-- this feels to be the polar opposite of a discounted carnival cruise line 'party barge' sailing through the western caribbean.
view from the deck-- icy waters, gulf of alaskamy main argument with taking this vacation was how it interfered with many projects in which my name was attached. i didn't want to be placed in a situation where i gave a half-assed performance in any of it, whether it was course work, employment, or an activity planned in advance. i didn't want to disrupt anyone else's plans, either. it turns out that i am organized enough to maintain or complete all which is essential.
wireless on board prices out at a typical $25 or more per hour. the price per minute varies based upon whether or not a block of time is purchased in advance. the computers available in the business centers insist on the same price paid as those using wireless on personal notebook computers. i knew it would be expensive, and am just wincing but bearing it-- barely! actually, $25 an hour isn't shocking at all. one minor inconvenience is that the internet service is provided by satellite, which means sporadic inaccessibility or occasional slowness depending on the ship's location. the real annoyance is that royal caribbean's brochure stated wireless internet was available throughout this ship and also in each cabin. it is not. in fact, it is difficult to pick up a signal in many of the hotspot locations. the hotspots also lack electrical outlets.
most of my major course work for the term is completed but it is really hard to log in and overpay to submit assignments and projects. big deal, so i'll have a $200+ internet charge on my personal account. c'mon, who cares?! well, i care. i don't so much care about the money, i care that there is no way to circumnavigate the charge. there is no cheaper option available for only the mere price of inconvenience. i'd go for that in a second.
i am starting to have a problem with food/dehydration here. i don't even know how to define it to myself. occasionally my brain gets stuck and that which is perfectly fine in any other situation cannot be acceptable in another. i am only tolerating two
see's vanilla lollypops (sic) and unlimited black coffee per day. perhaps, this relates to anxiety. i hate managing liquids, usually restrict coffee consumption, and ordinarily take it black for that matter. whatever is happening (and why i am allowed to abuse artificial sweetener today) is anyone's guess. note that typing out 'lollypops' instead of 'lollipops' is driving me nuts and will not continue.
in theory, with the availability of free 24 hour room service and the buffet dining rooms on this ship, i certainly could physically construct my food plan here. i don't know if both the assembly and the mental process can be implemented. bread is bread, right? yes, to anyone but me. i lack the security of the specifics and doubt the food plan will succeed during this vacation. then again, the doubt is stronger that i would find myself purposely choosing to eat and purge nervous foods anywhere near my mother's presence. i also am comfortable around her and usually do not restrict down to zero calories per day when we are together. so, leave it at "i don't know."
i am going to run out of see's pops. can i find them next friday in vancouver? probably not. the butterscotch and cafe latte varieties can be purchased in many airport giftshops, but usually the package is quite large. is there any way to order them and have a package deliv--
ah, surprise, anorexia is not allowing me to finish this idea. it's too bad because two see's vanilla lollipops compute to 120 calories. not having access to the security of that definitive consumption could potentially amount to how many calories? see, anorexia should not be stuffy and stoic if wanting to win this week.

my mother brought me an apple from a buffet this morning but the concept of 'apple' was suddenly lost on me. even though i packed an apple along from los angeles and ate it without issue upon arrival in anchorage, what was this weird mother-apple thing? why did she assume a buffet apple was in the same safety category as my own variety? why on earth did she think that 'apple' was 'apple' and totally disregard all implication of the situation which can either make 'apple' acceptable or vile? granted, she is not expected to understand all complexity, but by now she should be aware or be able to acknowledge it exists.
if 'apple' was fine in any situation, then how could i be considered ill? obviously if 'apple' was assumed to be acceptable, it would make sense to her that i always had 'apple' available to me. my illness suggests that this is clearly not the case. might she then think that anorexia is rooted in attitude rather than multiples of complicated explanations which can neither be articulated nor satisfy a person who has never dealt with this? no foods containing calories have ever been considered safe enough to be a constant in my life (although the food plan i am trying to conquer might change this statement soon).
why did she choose a hard, pointy, red apple from the pile of fruits? what was it about this particular apple she selected which proved to be *the* ultimate specimen to present to me? when the concept of 'apple' can work, i only allow round apples-- and this is not often. i don't like the angular idea behind what was brought to the table-- that being the fruit and the lack of awareness. her 'action' in this case invalidated 'apple.' notice how this 'food scenario' doesn't even begin to touch on the concept of eating. these days, i don't even need to focus on the horror of food or the concept of eating because 'mere situations involving food' are quickly invalidated.
a round apple might be fine, if green, and if it also fits in with an assortment of rules. a triangular-ish or heart-shaped pointy apple, as this, and in the color of sin, is not welcome. my independence is profound and this triangulation of poisoned nurturing heart/love apple feels terrorizing. perhaps this sounds crazier than i am about to write about, but "i'm not eating your goddamn triangular apple" makes sense right now. (...and the masses insist they understand the majority of this illness relates to an obsession with body weight. in the beginning, sure, but not when the illness is allowed to continue long term.) the anorexia expands and infiltrates multiple areas of life to the point that this apple was resisted well before nutrition, dieting/vanity, need/want, numeric obsession with calories/weight, or hunger entered the scene.
my mother also never understands the most important rule in the world outside of all relating to my limited consumption-- she mentions me and food in the same sentence to people 'on the outside.' granted, waitresses and waiters need to hear sentences about food orders, etc, but there is a way to do it without offending my illness.
"she is going to have ----"
"she WANTS ---"
oh my god, each time something like this is spoken aloud, the frustration is SO intense i think i will immediately pass out. what on earth is someone doing taking it upon themselves to squash my voice and proclaim for me that not only do i have the capacity for desire, but it relates to sustenance? is this simple situation and the overwhelming reaction enough to be considered traumatic? i think it will be looked upon as lame by a random reader, instead of illustrating just how many reverse steps have been taken to remove food/eating and its concept from my life. the mental illness has become all encompassing in that 'speaking about it wrong' can cause a tragedy. with that said, dealing with this broken rule wasn't all bad-- it reveals how grossly protected i am in daily life. i had begun to think the eating disorder was fairly naked these days. perhaps not if words are breaking me apart.
my doctor and i were concerned about 'after' this trip. after i visit with my family, i have bad experiences with mental health. we expect i will experience too much frustration and then perceive auditory hallucinations. i have been trying to watch every little thing i do in order to investigate how i operate-- which is crazy in itself because i don't know what to look for -- but perhaps in the future, this will help me know how to counter it.
well, i don't have to worry about the 'afterward' now. on the second day of this trip, i had the initial experience of that which was not there. at first the 'noise' sounded real, but then i became instantly aware that it did not exist.
i thought my opinion was that the 'noise' was useful in that it allows my stress a high level of value. the problem is... i don't feel stressed out to be around my mother or to be on this boat with thousands of strangers. i was never scared of this 'noise' before but now i am worried because i don't know what it means. i was once diagnosed with
post traumatic stress disorder (ptsd) relating to the time when i lived with my family. the idea that i now recognize that i experience auditory hallucinations when around them somewhat makes sense. it would make less sense that i did not react to family members whatsoever.
now, i guess, i don't know what that auditory sensation is 'for' because, in my opinion, i don't find that it needs to validate my hell right now. there really isn't any major discomfort other than "being stuck in a situation where i am assumed to be one of 'the sheep' and i am not one of 'the sheep.'" my mother has provided a few jackass moments but i expect nothing less from 99% of the population-- so is this an authentic frustration or a typical day?
consider: dehydration, while holding a different level of equilibrium rather than hedging into the land of first rank symptom. might this noise not have been a symptom of hell, and merely indicative of exhaustion?