paws, sitting in front of a computer monitorpaws had been very sick over the last week, was chronically vomiting up white foam, and subsequently dropped down to four and a half pounds. the cat took to a corner of the bed, insulated himself under a flat woven camel wool rug, and made a nice sanctuary of
kilim. aside from a few minor seizures, nothing provoked him to move. to put your ear to his body was to listen to the dead-- though paws was breathing, his physical machine was silent. those deficits were frightening.
apparently paws has a tumor which has grown large enough to block off and interfere with digestion, or an inflammatory bowel disease.
this doesn't make any sense-- chuck and i are certain his listlessness is related to packets of 'special kitty' cat food. paws was perfectly healthy last week. after allowing him to eat the wet packets of food for a few days, suddenly he refused everything, and was dying.
the veterinarian ignored our concerns about his change in food. veterinary diagnostics would involve anesthesia, and if a tumor was confirmed, an argument over reawakening. paws is also at an age where his stress matters more than any expense.
so, after a few days, and with that finality acknowledged (in concert with my emotional protocol) he died in my mind. just as everything else, since this relationship could not endure, it appeared to no longer exist.
time was sour-- persistent, annoying. i found myself mad rather than sympathetic. "isn't that the way it goes? now that i can afford the realm, it's you without time to spend." a receipt was fished from a drawer in the kitchen and its listing of an unopened bag of
iams digestive care dry food was confirmed. mm-hmm, no way was i going to get screwed out of this $8.99 refund-- i kept mentally pushing him away. later one particular night, when visions of a quarantine-free international relocation began to tease and attract, i was a bit disturbed to recognize pathology.
what i did know:
- the more you run over a dead cat, the flatter it gets
what i didn't know:
- how to practice the other side
- engaging reverse in this vehicle takes muscle
what i did:
- winced at metaphor: vehicle for body/health/life
- recalled a session with my physician to turn emotion on or around
- scratched the bridge of the cat's nose
AND attempted ___________ with enunciated words.
"this little problem we have doesn't take away this moment now, does it?"no, but, even though i was only talking to a pet
it it would take 500 moments to explain why i felt so corny
AND soft
AND perfectly ripe to be stabbed.
"it can't take away my memories. it doesn't take away yesterday... it doesn't take away the time we drove across the country and you howled out the moonroof at the stars each night."
"it doesn't take away the memory of the afternoon chuck and i returned home to find a bag of bagels empty, and you doing your listless boa constrictor impression on the tile in the middle of the kitchen floor... maybe that's your problem, eh? perhaps you just ate six bagels again and need time alone to digest."a few days went by, and paws finally (and surprisingly) got up. he has been eating tiny licks of gerber's turkey baby food and is drinking a liquid supplement called '
cat sip.' this morning he finally abandoned the sick dish, tested out his new dry food, and relocated to a chair which holds his favorite alpaca blanket.
it's somewhat bittersweet in how we both have a place from which to return, and again, no real way to articulate the experience.
-----------------------
[
updated: 3/20/07]
the veterinarian was wrong. the health of my cat's kidneys has been severely compromised due to the
recent menu foods pet food product recalls.
currently paws is tolerating and alternating between a brand of dry food called '
the goodlife recipe' and '
whiskas' pouches. neither of these options are affected by the recall nor are specialty foods-- they are available on grocery store shelves. paws is
very particular-- it's futile to expend toward
science diet' formulas or another premium cat food.
there was a sunday coupon for $5 off printed in the newspaper which made a bag of 'the goodlife recipe' cat food free-- basically this was bought and then brought home without any expectations. paws loves it. the goodlife recipe website cycles through various promotions and
occasionally sends out free coupons.
over the last few years, paws has refused all cat food except for 'iams dry' or 'special kitty' in the foil pouches. 'special kitty' is a wal-mart house brand and a recalled menu foods item. we knew the 'special kitty' was a horrible alternative and that menu foods was notorious for mistreating and testing on animals, but occasionally this was the only food paws would eat. he never liked 'whiskas' brand pouches before now, still snubs their 'tiny bites' version, but will eat it if fed the 'choice cuts' variety and it has been mashed up.
in regard to the baby food:
paws would tolerate "stage one" baby foods such as
gerber "turkey and turkey broth" and
beech nut "turkey and broth." these varieties are the tiniest jars of baby food and cost just under a dollar for approximately two ounces. though paws might taste homemade foods, such as a bite of prepared rice or vegetable, he would not eat any baby foods blended with vegetables, rice, or (obviously) onion. many brands of baby food reveal onion in the ingredient lists of even their most basic foods.
[
updated: 4/12/07]
paws has stopped eating 'the goodlife recipe' dry food. i tried forcing him to eat it by refusing to supply any 'whiskas' pouches, but he will not touch it. a new bag was purchased in case the other was stale (this food is very hard) but the fresher food has gone untouched, too. i also bought a new bag of 'iams dry' but when fed, paws would not even walk near his bowl. he would occasionally stand six feet away from his food area, and stretch to peer at his dish to see if it had been changed. i hope he is just being fussy. he also doesn't want to have anything to do with the 'cat sip' supplement.
[
updated: 4/28/07]
over the last two weeks, paws was still only eating 'whiskas' wet pouch food. in a way, i didn't want to mess with a good thing, but this food really gives him grief when using the litter box. it also makes him stink. the wet cat food is malodorous when compared to dry, the cat himself stinks, and the cat box becomes toxic after one use. plain canned pumpkin is known to be a good fibrous option to fix or regulate his problem, but, will he bother to eat it if i supplement his diet? probably not.
i reluctantly (and desperately) bought another new bag of 'iams dry' cat food the day before yesterday. paws went right over to it, ate it, and is now back to eating it full time. 'iams dry' has definitely reduced the problem relating to odor.
perhaps, after the catastrophe of the menu foods recalls, grocers and suppliers scrambled to clear, but still fill their grocery shelves. it seems impossible to have purchased two or three bags of stale cat food in a row, but considering the short time span and hysteria, this is probably what happened. the 'use by' dates which were printed on the bags claimed the food was fresh, but who knows where they had been or what most remaining and available stock had been put through that week.
[
updated: 4/23/08]
paws died today. my mental health has improved tremendously since my last updates and i am greatful that my cat gave me a whole year to let go. his last year has basically been spent sleeping on the bed or sniffing at food.
i started cooking for him-- went to the grocery store for him daily. he did well with a large selection of 'human foods' but enjoyed plain, boiled pasta and rice, mixed in with canned salmon. paws was hungry all of the time-- obviously allowed to eat whatever he wanted but never taking much. the year has been a very slow deterioration, but this last month was horrible.
i started to accept that "he seemed fine, considering the circumstances" but may or may not be alive the next morning. i don't function too well when there is nothing left to do but wait. understand my anxiety disorder has been *unfathomably* crazy lately. this death of a pet is huge-- fifteen years of love. i'm scared to run into someone who suggests it is not.
two weeks ago, paws started coughing up blood, seemed to recover in full the next few days, but then slowly came down. the decision to euthanize was terribly heavy, because, who am i? i am not god. how to choose whether or not he was suffering? what if someone suggested that it was i who was suffering instead? that would not be true. i would have attended him forever. on his last day, his kidneys finally failed and there was no decision left other than to relieve him of hell.
i researched many reviews of southern california animal hospitals. understand that these reviews are mostly written from pet owners who have been presented with enormous bills, or have just gone through a trauma. (or both) knowing this, i still had a difficult time finding a recommended clinic. people suggested the employees at many facilities were cold and aloof.
i would like to recommend the mission animal care center in granada hills, california. this clinic may have been out of the way, but it has a good reputation. chuck and i were under great distress. the staff was excellent and extremely compassionate.